Explore our platform and learn how it can help your application shine.
Learn about our history, our team, and our mission.
Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) is a method for restricting network access based on the roles of individual users. RBAC allows employees to access only the information they need to do their job. Employee roles in an organization determine the privileges granted to individuals and prevent lower-level employees from accessing sensitive information or performing higher-level tasks.
In the role-based access control data model, roles are based on several factors, including authorizations, responsibilities, and job competency. This model allows businesses to specify whether individuals are end-users, administrators, or expert users. Additionally, a user’s access to computing resources may be restricted to certain operations, such as viewing, creating, or modifying files.
Network access restrictions are especially important for organizations with large numbers of employees and for organizations that allow access to third parties such as customers and suppliers, which can be difficult to monitor. Companies that rely on RBAC can better protect their sensitive data and applications.
This is a part of an extensive series of guides about Access Management.
Before implementing RBAC in an enterprise, the organization should define the permissions for each role as thoroughly as possible. This includes precisely defining permissions in the following areas:
The first step to getting the most out of RBAC is to model roles and permissions. This includes assigning all employee responsibilities to specific roles that determine appropriate privileges. The organization can then assign roles based on the employee’s responsibilities.
Role-based access control allows organizations to assign one or more roles to each user or assign permissions individually. The goal is to define permissions that allow users to perform their tasks without further changes.
Organizations use Identity and Access Management (IAM) systems to implement and monitor RBAC. IAM primarily supports businesses with large numbers of employees by logging, monitoring, and updating all identities and permissions. Assigning permission is called “provisioning” and removing permission is called “deprovisioning”. This type of system requires organizations to establish a unified and standardized set of roles.
Within the RBAC framework, roles are semantics that organizations can use to build their privileges. Roles can be defined by various criteria, such as authority, responsibility, cost center, business unit, and more.
A role is a collection of user privileges. Roles are different from traditional groups, which are collections of users. In the context of RBAC, permissions are not directly associated with identities but rather with roles. Roles are more reliable than groups because they are organized around access management. In a typical organization, features and activities change less frequently than identities.
There are three types of access control in the RBAC standard: core, hierarchical, and restrictive.
The core model describes the key elements of a role-based access control system. Core RBAC can serve as a standalone access control method, but it is also the basis for the hierarchical and constraint models.
All RBAC models must adhere to the following rules:
Hierarchical RBAC builds on the basic RBAC model and introduces a role hierarchy. A role hierarchy is a way to structure roles to reflect a complex organizational structure and enable sharing and inheritance of permissions between roles. A simple example of hierarchical RBAC is a series of roles, in which each role inherits the permissions of the previous one, and adds more permissions:
This is useful because any permission added to the guest user, for example, will automatically be added to all roles.
Hierarchical RBAC supports several types of hierarchies:
The image below illustrates the hierarchy.
Constrained RBAC adds separation of duties to the core model. There are two types of separation of duties:
RBAC allows organizations to specify whether users are administrators, expert users, or end-users. Additional options include:
Each role can include a separate management layer and contributor layer. Different roles have varying privilege levels within a given application.
When an end-user’s job changes, the organization must manually reassign the roles to other users—or alternatively, assign the roles to a role group and use role assignment policies to add or remove members of role groups.
When users join a role group, they have access to all the roles in that group. Removing a user from a group restricts that user’s access. Another option is to temporarily assign users to multiple groups, granting them access to certain data or programs and removing them when they no longer need access.
RBAC is used to manage authorization in many modern IT systems, including those powering the transition to the cloud. Let’s see a few examples.
Azure RBAC is a real-world implementation of RBAC that helps administrators manage access to Azure resources and define exactly what actions can be performed within them. Azure RBAC is an authorization system based on Azure Resource Manager (ARM).
There are three key elements to assigning a role in Azure.
In Azure, it is possible to define scopes directly at the management group, subscription, resource group, or individual resource level. Scopes have a parent-child relationship, and the child resource inherits the permissions of the parent resource.
Azure includes several built-in roles based on industry best practices and Azure resource structures. Azure also provides compatibility for creating custom RBAC roles based on an organization’s requirements.
After defining roles and mapping scopes to these roles, administrators can use role assignments to grant access to a role scope for one or more security principles. They can also de-assign role assignments if the organization needs to remove access. Scopes thus make it easier to manage permissions.
The Amazon cloud provides RBAC through the Amazon Cognito service. Cognito enables authentication, authorization, and user management for mobile and web applications.
Cognito uses the concept of user pools, which are managed user directories, and identity pools, which allow users to gain access to other AWS services. Identity pools grant users temporary, limited-privilege access to AWS resources. These permissions are created through Amazon IAM roles. You can use tokens to assign roles to users of your applications, and leverage rule-based mapping to assign roles to users.
The RBAC model in Kubernetes includes the following components:
The rbac.authorization.k8s.io API group determines all role authorization decisions in a Kubernetes cluster. It is best to ensure that the RBAC roles in all clusters are enabled—this helps the organization secure the project and maintain security compliance.
Additional best practices for using Kubernetes RBAC include:
There are several ways to manage access control, including access control lists and attribute-based access control.
Access control lists (ACLs) are tables that list the permissions associated with computing resources. An ACL is an object-based access control mechanism defining who can access a specific object and what actions are permitted. The operating system allows access based on entries for every user in the system, which list the permitted actions (i.e., view, create, export, etc.).
RBAC is the better option for most organizations because it offers higher security and less administrative effort than ACLs. An ACL may be useful for controlling access to low-level data. However, RBAC is more effective for controlling access.
Attribute-based access control (ABAC) implements a set of policies that manage access permissions according to attributes (i.e., object, user, system, and environmental information). It uses boolean logic to determine if a user can access an object, evaluating set-valued or atomic attributes and their relationships to allow or deny access.
While RBAC relies on a predefined set of roles, ABAC is granular, making it more complex to manage. An example of the difference between RBAC and ABAC is that the first system might grant GitHub access to all users with a management role, while the second might restrict access to software engineers.
Related: RBAC vs ABAC
RBAC can help organizations enhance their security posture and ensure compliance with security standards and regulations. Implementing company-wide RBAC is often complex, so it is important to ensure successful adoption to keep stakeholders on board. When adopting role-based access control, organizations should organize the implementation process using the following phases:
Step 1: Determining the organization’s needs—the organization should comprehensively analyze its business needs before adopting RBAC. The analysis should determine which job functions support established business processes and tools. Auditing and other regulatory requirements should also help inform the RBAC policy. It may be useful to combine RBAC with an additional access control measure in some cases.
Step 2: Identifying the scope of implementation—the organization should identify the scope of the RBAC needs and align the implementation plan with these needs. The scope should be relatively narrow, focusing on apps and systems that process or store sensitive data. A limited scope makes for an easier transition.
Step 3: Defining the roles—the organization should define roles based on the conclusions of the needs analysis, considering how users can perform their tasks. It is important to avoid the pitfalls of role design, such as an inappropriate level or granularity, excessive exceptions, and overlapping roles.
Step 4: Rolling out the RBAC system—the organization should implement RBAC in stages to avoid disrupting business with overwhelming workloads. For example, the first stage might address a core user group, providing less granular access control and gradually providing more detailed roles. User feedback and monitoring of the RBAC implementation in the computing environment can help plan the rest of the rollout.
User management is a crucial component of modern SaaS apps due to the multiplication of use cases and customer requirements. You need robust and self-selved capabilities to create an app that can scale up fast without causing stress on IT and dev teams. Frontegg allows organizations to manage roles and permissions seamlessly without losing focus on core tech development.
Our end-to-end user management platform is completely self served and comes with predefined roles and permissions for quick implementation. We also allow the creation of new ones based on your requirements. That’s not all. Your customer’s end-users can also unlock a smooth in-app experience without putting additional stress on your IT teams. A truly self-served option.
Start For Free
Together with our content partners, we have authored in-depth guides on several other topics that can also be useful as you explore the world of access management.
Authored by Frontegg
Authored by Faddom
Rate this post
5 / 5. 1
No reviews yet
