Learn how PIM enhances security by granting time-limited auditable access to critical roles while reducing risk and enforcing compliance.
It ensures that only authorized users can access sensitive systems only when necessary. This reduces an application’s attack surface and enforces least privilege across cloud and on-prem environments.
A typical PIM workflow would look like the following: A user requests access to a sensitive role. The system may prompt for multi-factor authentication and a justification. If the role requires it, an approval workflow is triggered. Once approved, access is granted for a short duration and automatically expires. All actions are logged for auditing.
This just-in-time model prevents standing permissions from being abused and ensures that sensitive access is tightly governed.
While IAM governs identity and access for all users, and PAM manages long-term admin accounts and credentials, PIM zeroes in on when and how users receive elevated access. For example, in Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure Active Directory), PIM is used to grant time-limited access to resources.
PIM provides visibility into who holds privileged access, a threat vector that is often dangerously unobserved. For instance, only 62% of financial institutions report having complete visibility into all their managed privileged identities, and on average most industries have less than 65% visibility. This lack of visibility coincides with a greater potential for security breaches as Gartner reported more than 80% of security breaches involve the misuse or compromise of privileged credentials.
By removing permanent administrative access, organizations lower the risk of insider threats and credential misuse. This model also supports zero trust architecture by requiring continuous verification and purpose-specific access.
PIM is particularly valuable in industries with strict compliance requirements like healthcare, finance, and SaaS, where data protection is non-negotiable. Microsoft, for example, highlights PIM as a key tool in its zero trust strategy for Entra ID.
Imagine a DevOps engineer needs temporary access to update production infrastructure. They initiate a request through a PIM solution. The system might require multi-factor authentication and a reason for access.
If the request meets policy rules or is approved by a manager, access is granted for, say, one hour. During that time, every action is logged. Once the window closes, access is revoked without manual intervention.
This ensures every privilege grant is purposeful, time-bound, and accountable.
To implement PIM, you’ll begin by auditing which accounts and roles have elevated access. Then, you need to define policies for when access is required, who approves it, and how it should be logged.
Many organizations integrate PIM through platforms like Microsoft Entra ID or by layering on top of their existing setup. As they mature, they expand coverage across cloud infrastructure, SaaS apps, and internal tools.
A key step in rollout: training teams on when and how to request privileged access. This avoids delays and misuse.
Success with PIM depends on more than just tooling. It requires a thoughtful approach to how and when privileged roles are assigned.
Start by defining which roles and resources are considered privileged. This could include production access, security settings, customer data, or even feature toggles.
From there, apply these core best practices:
The goal isn’t just to lock things down, it’s to make privileged access purposeful, temporary, and traceable.
PIM sits at the intersection of operational agility and security. Dev teams need rapid access to troubleshoot production issues. Infosec needs assurance that those privileges are granted appropriately and not lingering indefinitely. Auditors want records showing that privileged access is reviewed and justified.
Everyone benefits when PIM is implemented well.
Frontegg simplifies privileged identity workflows by giving product and security teams direct control over role assignments, approvals, and access reviews without ticketing.
In many SaaS environments, waiting on engineering to assign roles or revoke access adds unnecessary risk and delay. Frontegg removes this bottleneck. Teams can assign privileged roles through a self-service portal, configure approval workflows, and conduct access reviews independently of developers.
Support for integrations and fine-grained RBAC makes Frontegg a strong fit for scaling PIM practices, especially for teams that want to move faster while staying in control.